HOME
pISSN 2005-9159
eISSN 2093-0569

Review Article

Korean J Pain 2025; 38(1): 4-13

Published online January 1, 2025 https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.24257

Copyright © The Korean Pain Society.

Nociplastic pain: controversy of the concept

Valdas Macionis

Independent Researcher, Vilnius, Lithuania

Correspondence to:Valdas Macionis
Independent Researcher, Fabijoniskiu 11, Vilnius 07122, Lithuania
Tel: +370 65674900, E-mail: valdas.macionis.md@gmail.com

Handling Editor: Francis S. Nahm

Received: August 5, 2024; Revised: October 22, 2024; Accepted: November 4, 2024

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Classically, pain can be of a nociceptive or neuropathic nature, which refers to non-neural or neural tissue lesions, respectively. Chronic pain in conditions such as migraine, fibromyalgia, and complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), is thought to perpetuate without a noxious input. Pain in such patients can be assigned neither to the nociceptive nor neuropathic category. Therefore, a third pain descriptor, named “nociplastic pain”, has been adopted by the International Association for the Study of Pain. The current controversy-focused narrative review updates littledebated aspects of the new pain concept. The most disputable feature of nociplastic pain is its autonomous persistence, i.e., existence without causative tissue damage, presumably because of a malfunction of pain pathways and processing. This contradicts the fact that nociplastic pain is accompanied by persistent central sensitization that has been shown to require a continuing noxious input, e.g ., nerve injury. Even if sensitization occurs without a lesion, e.g ., in psychogenic and emotional pain, peripheral stimulus is necessary to produce pain. A logical weakness of the concept is that the word “plastic” in biology refers to adaptation rather than to maladaptation. The pathophysiologic mechanism of nociplastic pain may, in fact, be associated with background conditions that elude diagnosis because of the limitations of current diagnostic means. Misapplication of the nociplastic pain category may weaken diagnostic alertness toward occult causes of pain. Possible diagnostic errors could be avoided by understanding that nociplastic pain is a mechanism of pain rather than a diagnosis. Clinical use of this pain descriptor deserves a wider critical discussion.

Keywords: Central Nervous System Sensitization, Chronic Pain, Complex Regional Pain Syndromes, Diagnosis, Fibromyalgia, Hypersensitivity, Neuralgia, Nociception

Chronic pain has been estimated to affect over one third of the global population [1,2]. Most chronic pain patients have underlying diseases that cause nociceptive or neuropathic pain—the two classical categories (mechanisms) of pain. Some chronic pain conditions cannot be associated with a specific cause. This has prompted the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) to introduce nociplastic pain as a third mechanistic descriptor of pain. Nociplastic pain, i.e., “pain that arises from altered nociception despite no clear evidence of actual or threatened tissue damage causing the activation of peripheral nociceptors or evidence for disease or lesion of the somatosensory system causing the pain” [3], was adopted as the new pain descriptor by the IASP in 2017 [4], soon following publication of the conceptual proposal by Kosek et al. [5] and a couple of supporting comments [6,7]. Few objections to the concept of nociplastic pain appeared at that time [8], and this category swiftly went viral in the pain research community. More fundamental criticism of nociplastic pain as a mechanism emerged later [912] but has not received much debate. The reason may be that a couple of points have been overlooked. The current review aims to draw attention to this gap in the literature.

The material for this paper was identified by searches of PubMed, Google Scholar, and references from relevant articles. The search terms “brain”, “changes”, “chronic”, “complex regional pain”, “concept”, “damage”, “definition”, “diagnosis”, “emotional”, “experimental”, “fibromyalgia”, “hypersensitivity”, “irritable bowel”, “lesion”, “low back”, “maladaptive”, “migraine”, “neck”, “nerve”, “neural”, “neuroimaging”, “nociceptive”, “nociplastic”, “pain”, “pathophysiology”, “plastic”, “psychogenic”, “review”, “sensitization”, “structural”, “syndrome”, “treatment”, and their derivatives and combinations were used. The article search focused on uncertain pathophysiological, clinical, and terminological aspects of the nociplastic pain, with special attention to its neuropathic features. The most recent articles including reviews and discussions of the relevant topics were preferred for citation.

1. Speculativeness of the nociplastic pain pathophysiology

Generation and perception of pain is one of the protective functions of the nervous system. Contrastingly, the definition of nociplastic pain implies that this pain exists because of alteration (or malfunction) of nociceptors and does not require any noxious input. In simple terms, nociplastic pain serves no functional purpose. This is a fundamental weak point of the concept, because function is uncoupled from structure. The causative interrelation between structure and function is an established axiom of biological evolution [13].

The pathophysiology of nociplastic pain is claimed to involve nociceptive central sensitization (hypersensitivity) [4,5,11,1416], which is considered to be an essential mechanism of all chronic pain conditions [17]. However, symptomatic nociceptive sensitization without continuing noxious input or pharmacological manipulation is a short-lived phenomenon [18,19], and there is no compelling substantiation of autonomous central sensitization [20] (which is understood to be a mechanism of nociplastic pain [11,16]). Electrophysiologically, neural sensitization means ongoing spontaneous activity (firing) of neurons [21,22], persistence of which has experimentally been shown to require supportive neuroinflammatory (i.e., noxious) input via local nerve lesion [23]. Moreover, nociceptive axons require neuroinflammatory stimulus to become mechnosensitive, and the latter feature seems to fade along with induced neuritis [2426]. Neural injury-induced behavioral hypersensitivity resolves in parallel with abnormal activity of sensory afferents [27]. Thus, nociplastic pain may in fact be caused by a persistence of organic pathology that eludes diagnosis but can drive central sensitization. The same conclusion can be drawn from the fact that chronic pain is usually of fluctuating nature in terms of recurrence and intensity [28], which can be explained by a periodic rekindling of latent sensitization [18,19] via alternating activity of some background organic condition. This reasoning questions the existence of nociplastic pain as such.

Several experimental models of acute pain transition to nociplastic pain have been introduced [29]. The follow-up periods employed by these studies seem to be too short (a maximum of eight weeks [30]) to claim induction of nociplastic pain. Diagnosis of chronic pain comes into consideration only three months after the start of unremitting pain [31], which is also applicable to nociplastic pain conditions [4]. Furthermore, these models come without any demonstration that acute pain induction has not resulted in permanent tissue damage and neural damage in particular. The injections of formalin [30], reserpine with acetic acid [32], and capsaicin with ethanol [33] apart from systemic effects may have induced long-lasting inflammation and fibrosis, which may have acted as noxious stimuli, especially upon motion. Admittedly, experimental mechanical hypersensitivity can also be induced without open peripheral injury, e.g., by intrathecal injection of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) that stimulates microglia, which in turn activates the second-order neurons [34]. However, neurotransmitters of pain are normally only released in response to certain stimuli, such as nerve injury or inflammation. Systemic action of experimental noxious substances may produce direct selective excitation of the second and third-order sensory neurons. It is also of importance that nociplastic pain models employ post-injury (or post-treatment) animal stimulation that involves repeated warm water immersions and vibration [35]. These procedures may be too traumatic to small animals. Vibration is a well-known cause of neural injury [36]. Unnatural exposures may produce muscle spasms or postural changes, which can affect nerves at the spinal level. Many other animal models of chronic pain can also be linked to pain-induced postural effects on spinal roots and nerves. Notably, extensive plantar injury in rats has been previously demonstrated to result in Wallerian degeneration of neural fibers of the L5 spinal nerve [37]. In healthy humans, most models of experimental pain involve direct noxious stimulation of tissue and have not been shown to last beyond three months [38]. Induction of hyperalgesia by immobilization both in humans [39] and animals [40] may also be associated with neural damage due to postural changes or direct neural compression.

Another issue of concern is that the concept of nonciplastic pain does not explain why not all pain patients invariably end up with this type of persistent pain. This question is a key test for the validity of any chronic pain theory. Aberrant changes in neurochemistry, such as glutamate/glutamine (Glx) and gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) levels in the brain, that have been found in nociplastic pain patients have not been shown to be exclusively specific to this condition [41,42]. Similar changes in neurotransmitter levels seem to be also present in neural injury-induced neuropathic pain [43]. Naturally, genes play a regulatory role. However, while certain genes can be associated with nociplastic pain [44], specific gene-related pathophysiology remains speculative. Anatomical predisposition to a compressive proximal neural lesion may be an explanation of genetic associations in many chronic pain conditions [45,46].

2. Occult neuropathy may be the cause of nociplastic pain

Can malfunction of the nervous system occur without its structural changes? One may argue that it is possible because neural functions can be altered by neurological drugs or other compounds. However, neuroactive substances, in fact, do interfere with neural structure by affecting neural receptors and ion channels. In natural conditions, release of pain mediators requires a continuing input, which also causes reversible or permanent changes of neural structure via receptor-binding mechanisms. The necessity of neuroinflammation to induce ongoing neuronal activity and mechanosensitivity [26,4751] (i.e., sensitization) raises further doubts as to whether nociplastic pain can occur without neural lesion.

As nociplastic pain syndromes have been categorized such enigmatic conditions as fibromyalgia, complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), chronic primary headaches, including migraine [14,52], chronic whiplash-associated disorders [53], non-specific low back pain [14], and irritable bowel syndrome [14,16]. Such views are disputable. Evidence is accumulating that neuropathy may be the cause of these and other types of chronic pain [9,54,55]. CRPS type I (that is considered to be of non-neurogenic origin, but which exhibits clinical features which are identical to those of nerve injury-based CRPS type II [56]) has been shown to be associated with histological peripheral nerve changes [57,58]. Convincing are patient series where CRPS type I was found to be related to peripheral neural damage [5860]. Fibromyalgia, probably most frequently referred to as a nociplastic pain condition, has also been associated with neural pathology [6164]. Widespread pain in fibromyalgia is not truly generalized but rather tends to be located in circumscribed body areas [65,66], which can be associated with distinct innervation patterns. This is in accord with segmental spread of fibromyalgia pain and trigger points [67]. Extra-segmental spread of pain [67] may be due to posture-related neural damage and neural interconnections in the central nervous system. The same explanation is applicable to non-symptomatic hypersensitivity that has been detected in some fibromyalgia pain-free areas [68]. Relevantly, Kosek et al. [4] included the presence of comorbidities (such as increased sensitivity to sound, light, and odors, sleep disturbances, fatigue, and cognitive problems) into their clinical criteria and grading system for musculoskeletal nociplastic pain. These comorbidity phenomena can also be explained by the spread of sensitization to uninvolved neural structures. Trigger points (which are observed in fibromyalgia [67], non-specific low back pain [69], and neck pain [70]) have anatomically been shown to be associated with neural entrapment at the tender sites, where nerves enter muscles [7174] and the fascial openings contain a nerve with accompanying vessels (a “perforating triad”) [75]. This implies peripheral sensitization by some lesion of afferent nerves. Structural brain changes that have been found by neuroimaging in fibromyalgia [76,77], CRPS type I [78], migraine [7981], non-specific neck pain [82], non-specific low back pain [83,84], and irritable bowel syndrome [85] may be a result of peripheral neural damage and consequent reduction of afferent input (see the relevant references in [46]).

It must be noted that neuropathic pain is not necessarily accompanied by typical symptoms of neuropathy. For example, neuralgic amyotrophy can present with motor symptoms but without sensory involvement [86]. This may be due to the greater vulnerability of motor fibers as compared with sensory ones [87,88], which may also account for the cases of the co-occurring fatigue-only symptom in fibromyalgia [89].

Toda [12] has suggested regarding nociplastic pain as a subtype of neuropathic pain due to the similarity between treatments of these disorders. Notably, opioids have not been recommended for treatment of nociplastic as well as of neuropathic pain [90]. This coincidence may indicate a neuropathic nature of nociplastic pain. It is known that opioids can worsen both neuropathic [91] and nociplastic pain [92], possibly because of opioid-induced neurotoxicity [93] and neural damage [9496]. Neuropeptides can attenuate opioid-induced hyperalgesia [97,98], which may be due to their neurotrophic effects. Therefore, opioid-induced hyperalgesia may be a consequence of neural damage rather than secondary nociplastic pain as previously suggested [99].

3. Can nociplastic pain be a mechanism of psyche-driven pain?

Emotional experience is a constituent part of the general definition of pain [3]. In this respect, psychogenic (somatoform) and pure emotional (psychological) pain are important subjects of the nociplastic pain concept. Psychogenic pain is considered physical pain caused by the psyche [100,101], while emotional pain is mental suffering without any concrete representation in the physical body [102]. However, research indicates that sensitization (neural hypersensitivity) can be caused both by psychogenic [103] and by emotional pain [104]. Emotional pain can also be linked with physical pain because emotional pain can cause immunologic and hormonal changes, which could be associated with minor traumatic brain injury [105].

On the other hand, once nociceptive pathways are sensitized, non-painful (subthreshold) stimuli may become painful. Physical pain can influence the psyche, and, thus, a vicious cycle between them may develop. Emotions can amplify somatic chronic pain [106]. Sensitization alone does not cause pain without stimulus, be it noxious or innocuous. Initial stages of some diseases, while being non-symptomatic, may affect the psyche. Psyche-driven sensitization may have a protective function, which can be in agreement with the evolutionary defensive purpose of pain (including psychogenic pain [101]) and would contradict the suggestion that central sensitization in nociplastic pain is a pathophysiological maladaptation [16,107]. Thus, while psyche-driven pain can support the nociplastic pain concept, its controversy remains.

4. Misapplication of the nociplastic pain concept may weaken diagnostic alertness

Nociplastic pain denotes the mechanism of pain, not a diagnosis [5]. Relevant concept-based studies continue to appear and include clinical research. Adherence to the category of nociplastic pain in the clinical setting may weaken vigilance toward possible occult organic causes of pain. The suggestion that a search for a causative condition can be discontinued once the diagnosis of nociplastic pain has become credible [108] is difficult to accept without discussion. For example, a neoplasm at its initial stage may be undetectable but may cause persistent pain. If the latter is defined as nociplastic, then the patient may remain in this category until the tumor becomes clinically obvious. Rigorous adherence to the suggestion to treat nociplastic pain with centrally targeted medications [4] may worsen a clinical picture by masking, and thus aggravating, possible compressive peripheral neuropathy [45]. Errors may also arise because of limited experience and diagnostic capacity. Of note, misdiagnosis in chronic pain conditions has been found to range from 40% to 80% [109], which includes frequent overlooking of neural compressive disorders [110].

Toda [12] indicated that higher “medical thresholds” in the future (which obviously alludes to advanced diagnostic standards and means) may enable us to reveal background somatosensory lesions in nociplastic pain. Hoegh et al. [10] proposed replacing the term “nociplastic pain” with the classical “pain of unknown origin” to avoid invalidating the patients who do not fall into the nociplastic pain category. The counter-argument that it is nociplastic pain category that helps to avoid invalidating patients [111] still lacks comparative clinical evidence of benefits of using the nociplastic pain concept. The term “pain of unknown origin,” differently from that of “nociplastic pain,” leaves the question of pain origin open and thus encourages diagnostic alertness.

5. The category of nociplastic pain is contradictory

Speculative use of the word “plastic” was often employed when observed phenomena could not be explained by the available knowledge and research methods [112]. The term “nociplastic pain,” apart from the nosological challenges [11], adds another semantic confusion to the growing perplexity of interpretation of the word “plastic” [8,113]. “Nociplastic pain” is supposed to signify the pathology of nociception (initially, Kosek at al. [5] proposed alternative terms of “algopathic and “nocipathic” pain). Meanwhile, plasticity in biology is understood as organisms’ adaptivity to environmental changes [114]. Similarly, neural plasticity has been defined as the ability of the nervous system to adapt in response to experience or injury [115]. Notably, “nociceptive plasticity” (the antecedent of “nociplastic” [5]) meant neurophysiologic adaptation rather than pathology when this term was introduced by Walters [116] in 1991. The concept of maladaptive neural plasticity in association with chronic pain emerged around the same time [117] and was later theorized to be the mechanism of dysfunctional pain (see, e.g., Costigan et al. [17]). Unfortunately, the definition of nociplastic pain comes without any reference to maladaptive plasticity [3,4,11], which does not facilitate the correct interpretation of the term “nociplastic.”

The term “clear evidence” is another semantic issue of the nociplastic pain definition [3]. By common logic, the definition phrase “despite no clear evidence of actual or threatened tissue damage” indicates that any relevant evidence is absent beyond doubt. However, this phrase may also imply that some unclear evidence of actual tissue or somatosensory lesion (and thus of nociceptive or neuropathic pain) exists, which may leave the readers of the definition to decide for themselves what is clear and what is unclear evidence.

By definition, nociplastic pain is autonomous pain due to a malfunction of pain pathways and processing. The only diagnostic proof of nociplastic pain is the absence of clear evidence of structural causes of pain. A number of studies have shown that persistence of central sensitization, a mechanism of nociplastic pain, is unlikely without supportive noxious stimuli. Occult, currently undetectable, conditions associated with neural damage may explain nociplastic pain. For clinically practical purposes, understanding the term “nociplastic pain” as a mechanism of pain rather than as a diagnosis may help to avoid possible diagnostic and treatment errors. The theoretical uncertainty of the nociplastic pain concept should be further discussed, and its practical application should be reappraised.

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed for this paper.

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

  1. Jackson T, Thomas S, Stabile V, Shotwell M, Han X, McQueen K. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the global burden of chronic pain without clear etiology in low- and middle-income countries: trends in heterogeneous data and a proposal for new assessment methods. Anesth Analg 2016; 123: 739-48.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Tsang A, Von Korff M, Lee S, Alonso J, Karam E, Angermeyer MC, et al. Common chronic pain conditions in developed and developing countries: gender and age differences and comorbidity with depression-anxiety disorders. J Pain 2008; 9: 883-91. Erratum in: J Pain 2009; 10: 553.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. International Association for the Study of Pain. Terminology [Internet]. International Association for the Study of Pain. Available at: https://www.iasp-pain.org/resources/terminology/.
  4. Kosek E, Clauw D, Nijs J, Baron R, Gilron I, Harris RE, et al. Chronic nociplastic pain affecting the musculoskeletal system: clinical criteria and grading system. Pain 2021; 162: 2629-34.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. Kosek E, Cohen M, Baron R, Gebhart GF, Mico JA, Rice ASC, et al. Do we need a third mechanistic descriptor for chronic pain states? Pain 2016; 157: 1382-6.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Moloney N, Rabey M, Nijs J, Hush J, Slater H. Support for extended classification of pain states. Pain 2017; 158: 1395.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  7. Brummett C, Clauw D, Harris R, Harte S, Hassett A, Williams D. We agree with the need for a new term but disagree with the proposed terms. Pain 2016; 157: 2876.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Granan LP. We do not need a third mechanistic descriptor for chronic pain states! Not yet. Pain 2017; 158: 179.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  9. Martínez-Lavín M. Centralized nociplastic pain causing fibromyalgia: an emperor with no cloths? Clin Rheumatol 2022; 41: 3915-7.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  10. Hoegh M, Schmid AB, Hansson P, Finnerup NB. Not being able to measure what is important, does not make things we can measure important. Pain 2022; 163: e963.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  11. Cohen M, Quintner J, Weisman A. "Nociplastic pain": a challenge to nosology and to nociception. J Pain 2023; 24: 2131-9.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Toda K. Pure nociceptive pain is very rare. Curr Med Res Opin 2019; 35: 1991.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  13. Herman MA, Aiello BR, DeLong JD, Garcia-Ruiz H, González AL, Hwang W, et al. A unifying framework for understanding biological structures and functions across levels of biological organization. Integr Comp Biol 2022; 61: 2038-47.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  14. Fitzcharles MA, Cohen SP, Clauw DJ, Littlejohn G, Usui C, Häuser W. Nociplastic pain: towards an understanding of prevalent pain conditions. Lancet 2021; 397: 2098-110.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  15. Nijs J, Lahousse A, Kapreli E, Bilika P, Saraçoğlu İ, Malfliet A, et al. Nociplastic pain criteria or recognition of central sensitization? Pain phenotyping in the past, present and future. J Clin Med 2021; 10: 3203.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  16. Yoo YM, Kim KH. Current understanding of nociplastic pain. Korean J Pain 2024; 37: 107-18.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  17. Costigan M, Scholz J, Woolf CJ. Neuropathic pain: a maladaptive response of the nervous system to damage. Annu Rev Neurosci 2009; 32: 1-32.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  18. Marvizon JC, Walwyn W, Minasyan A, Chen W, Taylor BK. Latent sensitization: a model for stress-sensitive chronic pain. Curr Protoc Neurosci 2015; 71: 9.50.1-9.50.14.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  19. Gerum M, Simonin F. Behavioral characterization, potential clinical relevance and mechanisms of latent pain sensitization. Pharmacol Ther 2022; 233: 108032.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  20. Brazenor GA, Malham GM, Teddy PJ. Can central sensitization after injury persist as an autonomous pain generator? A comprehensive search for evidence. Pain Med 2022; 23: 1283-98.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  21. Bove GM, Dilley A. The conundrum of sensitization when recording from nociceptors. J Neurosci Methods 2010; 188: 213-8.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  22. Malick A, Burstein R. Peripheral and central sensitization during migraine. Funct Neurol 2000; 15 Suppl 3: 28-35.
  23. Satkeviciute I, Goodwin G, Bove GM, Dilley A. Time course of ongoing activity during neuritis and following axonal transport disruption. J Neurophysiol 2018; 119: 1993-2000.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  24. Dilley A, Bove GM. Resolution of inflammation-induced axonal mechanical sensitivity and conduction slowing in C-fiber nociceptors. J Pain 2008; 9: 185-92.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  25. Bove GM, Ransil BJ, Lin HC, Leem JG. Inflammation induces ectopic mechanical sensitivity in axons of nociceptors innervating deep tissues. J Neurophysiol 2003; 90: 1949-55.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  26. Greening J, Dilley A. In: In: Neck and arm pain syndromes. Edited by Fernández de las Peñas C, Cleland JA, Huijbregts PA. Churchill Livingstone. 2011, pp 476-95.
    CrossRef
  27. Boada MD, Martin TJ, Parker R, Houle TT, Eisenach JC, Ririe DG. Recovery from nerve injury induced behavioral hypersensitivity in rats parallels resolution of abnormal primary sensory afferent signaling. Pain 2020; 161: 949-59.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  28. Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe FJ, Dworkin SF. Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain 1992; 50: 133-49.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  29. Matuska W, Matuska J, Skorupska E, Siwek M, Herrero P, Santafé MM. Can myofascial trigger points involve nociplastic pain? A scoping review on animal models. J Pain Res 2023; 16: 3747-58.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  30. Sugimoto M, Takahashi Y, Sugimura YK, Tokunaga R, Yajima M, Kato F. Active role of the central amygdala in widespread mechanical sensitization in rats with facial inflammatory pain. Pain 2021; 162: 2273-86.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  31. Treede RD, Rief W, Barke A, Aziz Q, Bennett MI, Benoliel R, et al. Chronic pain as a symptom or a disease: the IASP Classification of Chronic Pain for the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). Pain 2019; 160: 19-27.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  32. Álvarez-Pérez B, Deulofeu M, Homs J, Merlos M, Vela JM, Verdú E, et al. Long-lasting reflexive and nonreflexive pain responses in two mouse models of fibromyalgia-like condition. Sci Rep 2022; 12: 9719.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  33. Hankerd K, McDonough KE, Wang J, Tang SJ, Chung JM, La JH. Postinjury stimulation triggers a transition to nociplastic pain in mice. Pain 2022; 163: 461-73.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  34. Biggs JE, Lu VB, Stebbing MJ, Balasubramanyan S, Smith PA. Is BDNF sufficient for information transfer between microglia and dorsal horn neurons during the onset of central sensitization? Mol Pain 2010; 6: 44.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  35. McDonough KE. .
  36. Govindaraju SR, Curry BD, Bain JLW, Riley DA. Nerve damage occurs at a wide range of vibration frequencies. Int J Ind Ergon 2008; 38: 687-92.
    CrossRef
  37. Kajita Y, Suetomi K, Okada T, Ikeuchi M, Arai YC, Sato K, et al. Behavioral and neuropathological changes in animal models of chronic painful scar. J Orthop Sci 2013; 18: 1005-11.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  38. Reddy KS, Naidu MU, Rani PU, Rao TR. Human experimental pain models: a review of standardized methods in drug development. J Res Med Sci 2012; 17: 587-95.
  39. Terkelsen AJ, Bach FW, Jensen TS. Experimental forearm immobilization in humans induces cold and mechanical hyperalgesia. Anesthesiology 2008; 109: 297-307.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  40. Liu Y, Liang Y, Gao M, Li Y, Zhao T, Zhao Y. Animal models of complex regional pain syndrome type I. J Pain Res 2021; 14: 3711-21.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  41. Mawla IA. .
  42. Mawla I, Huang Z, Kaplan CM, Ichesco E, Waller N, Larkin TE, et al. Large-scale momentary brain co-activation patterns are associated with hyperalgesia and mediate focal neurochemistry and cross-network functional connectivity in fibromyalgia. Pain 2023; 164: 2737-48.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  43. Huynh V, Rosner J, Curt A, Kollias S, Hubli M, Michels L. Disentangling the effects of spinal cord injury and related neuropathic pain on supraspinal neuroplasticity: a systematic review on neuroimaging. Front Neurol 2020; 10: 1413.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  44. Johnston KJA, Signer R, Huckins LM. Chronic overlapping pain conditions and nociplastic pain. HGG Adv 2024; 6: 100381.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  45. Macionis V. Chronic pain and local pain in usually painless conditions including neuroma may be due to compressive proximal neural lesion. Front Pain Res (Lausanne) 2023; 4: 1037376.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  46. Macionis V. Neurovascular compression-induced intracranial allodynia may be the true nature of migraine headache: an interpretative review. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2023; 27: 775-91.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  47. Goodwin G. .
  48. Dilley A, Bove GM. Disruption of axoplasmic transport induces mechanical sensitivity in intact rat C-fibre nociceptor axons. J Physiol 2008; 586: 593-604.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  49. Eliav E, Benoliel R, Tal M. Inflammation with no axonal damage of the rat saphenous nerve trunk induces ectopic discharge and mechanosensitivity in myelinated axons. Neurosci Lett 2001; 311: 49-52.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  50. Chacur M, Milligan ED, Gazda LS, Armstrong C, Wang H, Tracey KJ, et al. A new model of sciatic inflammatory neuritis (SIN): induction of unilateral and bilateral mechanical allodynia following acute unilateral peri-sciatic immune activation in rats. Pain 2001; 94: 231-44.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  51. Dilley A, Lynn B, Pang SJ. Pressure and stretch mechanosensitivity of peripheral nerve fibres following local inflammation of the nerve trunk. Pain 2005; 117: 462-72.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  52. Bułdyś K, Górnicki T, Kałka D, Szuster E, Biernikiewicz M, Markuszewski L, et al. What do we know about nociplastic pain? Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11: 1794.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  53. Ferro Moura Franco K, Lenoir D, Dos Santos Franco YR, Jandre Reis FJ, Nunes Cabral CM, Meeus M. Prescription of exercises for the treatment of chronic pain along the continuum of nociplastic pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Eur J Pain 2021; 25: 51-70.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  54. Borchers AT, Gershwin ME. The clinical relevance of complex regional pain syndrome type I: The Emperor's New Clothes. Autoimmun Rev 2017; 16: 22-33.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  55. Trescot AM, Krashin D. In: In: Peripheral nerve entrapments: clinical diagnosis and management. Edited by Trescot AM. Springer Cham. 2016, pp 15-7.
    CrossRef
  56. Harden RN, McCabe CS, Goebel A, Massey M, Suvar T, Grieve S, et al. Complex regional pain syndrome: practical diagnostic and treatment guidelines, 5th edition. Pain Med 2022; 23(Suppl 1): S1-53.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  57. van der Laan L, ter Laak HJ, Gabreëls-Festen A, Gabreëls F, Goris RJ. Complex regional pain syndrome type I (RSD): pathology of skeletal muscle and peripheral nerve. Neurology 1998; 51: 20-5.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  58. Oaklander AL, Fields HL. Is reflex sympathetic dystrophy/complex regional pain syndrome type I a small-fiber neuropathy? Ann Neurol 2009; 65: 629-38.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  59. Dellon L, Andonian E, Rosson GD. Lower extremity complex regional pain syndrome: long-term outcome after surgical treatment of peripheral pain generators. J Foot Ankle Surg 2010; 49: 33-6.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  60. Dellon AL, Andonian E, Rosson GD. CRPS of the upper or lower extremity: surgical treatment outcomes. J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj 2009; 4: 1.
  61. On AY, Tanigor G, Baydar DA. Relationships of autonomic dysfunction with disease severity and neuropathic pain features in fibromyalgia: is it really a sympathetically maintained neuropathic pain? Korean J Pain 2022; 35: 327-35.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  62. Viceconti A, Geri T, De Luca S, Maselli F, Rossettini G, Sulli A, et al. Neuropathic pain and symptoms of potential small-fiber neuropathy in fibromyalgic patients: a national on-line survey. Joint Bone Spine 2021; 88: 105153.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  63. Di Carlo M, Cesaroni P, Salaffi F. Neuropathic pain features suggestive of small fibre neuropathy in fibromyalgia syndrome: a clinical and ultrasonographic study on female patients. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2021; 39 Suppl 130: 102-7.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  64. Hulens M, Bruyninckx F, Rasschaert R, Vansant G, De Mulder P, Stalmans I, et al. Electrodiagnostic abnormalities associated with fibromyalgia. J Pain Res 2020; 13: 737-44.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  65. Staud R, Price DD, Robinson ME, Vierck CJ Jr. Body pain area and pain-related negative affect predict clinical pain intensity in patients with fibromyalgia. J Pain 2004; 5: 338-43.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  66. Staud R, Vierck CJ, Robinson ME, Price DD. Overall fibromyalgia pain is predicted by ratings of local pain and pain-related negative affect--possible role of peripheral tissues. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2006; 45: 1409-15.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  67. Ge HY. Prevalence of myofascial trigger points in fibromyalgia: the overlap of two common problems. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2010; 14: 339-45.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  68. Fernandez-de-las-Penas C. .
  69. Chiarotto A, Clijsen R, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Barbero M. Prevalence of myofascial trigger points in spinal disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2016; 97: 316-37.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  70. Cerezo-Téllez E, Torres-Lacomba M, Mayoral-Del Moral O, Sánchez-Sánchez B, Dommerholt J, Gutiérrez-Ortega C. Prevalence of myofascial pain syndrome in chronic non-specific neck pain: a population-based cross-sectional descriptive study. Pain Med 2016; 17: 2369-77.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  71. Akamatsu FE, Saleh S, Pinesi HT, Rodrigues KR, Zandoná CB, Andrade M, et al. Anatomical basis of the myofascial trigger points of the trapezius muscle. Int J Morphol 2013; 31: 915-20.
    CrossRef
  72. Akamatsu FE, Yendo TM, Rhode C, Itezerote AM, Hojaij F, Andrade M, et al. Anatomical basis of the myofascial trigger points of the gluteus maximus muscle. Biomed Res Int 2017; 2017: 4821968.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  73. Wada JT, Akamatsu F, Hojaij F, Itezerote A, Scarpa JC, Andrade M, et al. An anatomical basis for the myofascial trigger points of the abductor hallucis muscle. Biomed Res Int 2020; 2020: 9240581.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  74. Procópio Pinheiro R, Gaubeur MA, Itezerote AM, Saleh SO, Hojaij F, Andrade M, et al. Anatomical study of the innervation of the masseter muscle and its correlation with myofascial trigger points. J Pain Res 2020; 13: 3217-26.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  75. Gautschi RU. In: In: Fascia: the tensional network of the human body. Edited by Schleip R, Stecco C, Driscoll M, Huijing P. 2nd ed. Elsevier. 2021, pp 329-40.
  76. Jorge LL, Amaro E Jr. Brain imaging in fibromyalgia. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2012; 16: 388-98.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  77. Suñol M, Payne MF, Tong H, Maloney TC, Ting TV, Kashikar-Zuck S, et al. Brain structural changes during juvenile fibromyalgia: relationships with pain, fatigue, and functional disability. Arthritis Rheumatol 2022; 74: 1284-94.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  78. Lee DH, Lee KJ, Cho KI, Noh EC, Jang JH, Kim YC, et al. Brain alterations and neurocognitive dysfunction in patients with complex regional pain syndrome. J Pain 2015; 16: 580-6.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  79. Hasan H, Irfan Waheed R, Bin Arif T, Saleem S, Anwar A. Gray and white matter changes in migraineurs: a review of literature. SN Compr Clin Med 2020; 2: 2185-96.
    CrossRef
  80. Kim SK, Nikolova S, Schwedt TJ. Structural aberrations of the brain associated with migraine: a narrative review. Headache 2021; 61: 1159-79.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  81. Ashina S, Bentivegna E, Martelletti P, Eikermann-Haerter K. Structural and functional brain changes in migraine. Pain Ther 2021; 10: 211-23.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  82. DePauw R, Coppieters I, Meeus M, Caeyenberghs K, Danneels L, Cagnie B. Is traumatic and non-traumatic neck pain associated with brain alterations? - A systematic review. Pain Physician 2017; 20: 245-60.
    CrossRef
  83. Kregel J, Meeus M, Malfliet A, Dolphens M, Danneels L, Nijs J, et al. Structural and functional brain abnormalities in chronic low back pain: a systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2015; 45: 229-37.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  84. Ng SK, Urquhart DM, Fitzgerald PB, Cicuttini FM, Hussain SM, Fitzgibbon BM. The relationship between structural and functional brain changes and altered emotion and cognition in chronic low back pain brain changes: a systematic review of MRI and fMRI studies. Clin J Pain 2018; 34: 237-61.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  85. Weaver KR, Sherwin LB, Walitt B, Melkus GD, Henderson WA. Neuroimaging the brain-gut axis in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 2016; 7: 320-33.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  86. van Alfen N, van Engelen BG. The clinical spectrum of neuralgic amyotrophy in 246 cases. Brain 2006; 129(Pt 2): 438-50.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  87. Kaji R. Physiology of conduction block in multifocal motor neuropathy and other demyelinating neuropathies. Muscle Nerve 2003; 27: 285-96.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  88. Hofmeijer J, Franssen H, van Schelven LJ, van Putten MJ. Why are sensory axons more vulnerable for ischemia than motor axons? PLoS One 2013; 8: e67113.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  89. Creavin ST, Dunn KM, Mallen CD, Nijrolder I, van der Windt DA. Co-occurrence and associations of pain and fatigue in a community sample of Dutch adults. Eur J Pain 2010; 14: 327-34.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  90. Moisset X, Bouhassira D, Avez Couturier J, Alchaar H, Conradi S, Delmotte MH, et al. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for neuropathic pain: systematic review and French recommendations. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2020; 176: 325-52.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  91. Li L, Chen J, Li YQ. The downregulation of opioid receptors and neuropathic pain. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24: 5981.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  92. Holman A, Parikh N, Clauw DJ, Williams DA, Tapper EB. Contemporary management of pain in cirrhosis: toward precision therapy for pain. Hepatology 2023; 77: 290-304.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  93. Pereira J, Bruera E. Emerging neuropsychiatric toxicities of opioids. J Pharm Care Pain Symptom Control 1997; 5: 3-29.
    CrossRef
  94. Mao J, Sung B, Ji RR, Lim G. Neuronal apoptosis associated with morphine tolerance: evidence for an opioid-induced neurotoxic mechanism. J Neurosci 2002; 22: 7650-61.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  95. Cunha-Oliveira T, Rego AC, Oliveira CR. Cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in the neurotoxicity of opioid and psychostimulant drugs. Brain Res Rev 2008; 58: 192-208.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  96. Niedzielska E, Rospond B, Pomierny-Chamioło L, Sadakierska-Chudy A, Filip M. In: In: Handbook of neurotoxicity. Edited by Kostrzewa RM. Springer New York. 2014, pp 455-512.
    CrossRef
  97. Youn DH, Jun J, Kim TW, Park K. Spinal orexin A attenuates opioid-induced mechanical hypersensitivity in the rat. Korean J Pain 2022; 35: 433-9.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  98. Mercadante S, Arcuri E, Santoni A. Opioid-induced tolerance and hyperalgesia. CNS Drugs 2019; 33: 943-55.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  99. Santoni A, Arcuri E. The ambiguity of opioids revealed by immunology is changing the knowledge and the therapeutic approach in cancer and non-cancer pain: a narrative review. Immunol Lett 2020; 226: 12-21.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  100. Covington EC. Psychogenic pain-what it means, why it does not exist, and how to diagnose it. Pain Med 2000; 1: 287-94.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  101. de Greck M. In: In: Neuropsychodynamic psychiatry. Edited by Boeker H, Hartwich P, Northoff G. Springer Cham. 2018, pp 319-34.
    CrossRef
  102. Tossani E. The concept of mental pain. Psychother Psychosom 2013; 82: 67-73.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  103. Egloff N, Cámara RJ, von Känel R, Klingler N, Marti E, Ferrari ML. Hypersensitivity and hyperalgesia in somatoform pain disorders. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2014; 36: 284-90.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  104. Mohammadi F, Kohlmeier KA, Jeddi S, Ahmadi-Zeidabadi M, Shabani M. Affective dimensions of pain and region -specific involvement of nitric oxide in the development of empathic hyperalgesia. Sci Rep 2020; 10: 10141.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  105. Shulman LM. Emotional traumatic brain injury. Cogn Behav Neurol 2020; 33: 301-3.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  106. Vachon-Presseau E, Centeno MV, Ren W, Berger SE, Tétreault P, Ghantous M, et al. The emotional brain as a predictor and amplifier of chronic pain. J Dent Res 2016; 95: 605-12.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  107. Popkirov S, Enax-Krumova EK, Mainka T, Hoheisel M, Hausteiner-Wiehle C. Functional pain disorders - more than nociplastic pain. NeuroRehabilitation 2020; 47: 343-53.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  108. Fitzcharles MA, Petzke F, Tölle TR, Häuser W. Cannabis-based medicines and medical cannabis in the treatment of nociplastic pain. Drugs 2021; 81: 2103-16.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  109. Hendler N. Why chronic pain patients are misdiagnosed 40 to 80% of the time? J Recent Adv Pain 2016; 2: 94-8.
    CrossRef
  110. Hendler NH, Kozikowski JG. Overlooked physical diagnoses in chronic pain patients involved in litigation. Psychosomatics 1993; 34: 494-501.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  111. Kosek E, Clauw D, Nijs J, Baron R, Gilron I, Harris RE, et al. Reply to Hoegh et al. Pain 2023; 164: e116.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  112. Flores C. Plastic intellectual breeze: the contribution of Ralph Cudworth to S. T. Coleridge's early poetics of the symbol. Peter Lang. 2008.
  113. van der Laan JM. Plastic words: words without meaning. Bull Sci Technol Soc 2001; 21: 349-53.
    CrossRef
  114. Skipper M, Weiss U, Gray N. Plasticity. Nature 2010; 465: 703.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  115. von Bernhardi R, Bernhardi LE, Eugenín J. What is neural plasticity? Adv Exp Med Biol 2017; 1015: 1-15.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  116. Walters ET. A functional, cellular, and evolutionary model of nociceptive plasticity in aplysia. Biol Bull 1991; 180: 241-51.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  117. McQuay HJ, Dickenson AH. Implications of nervous system plasticity for pain management. Anaesthesia 1990; 45: 101-2.
    Pubmed CrossRef