Characteristics of included randomized controlled trials (RCTs)

References Year Study design Country/center(s) No. of patients analyzed No. of patients analyzed in each group Age (yr) Sex (M/F) QLB type Types and doses of local anesthetics Surgery
QLB Control QLB Control
Abdelbaser et al. [18] 2023 Prospective/RCT Egypt/single-center 68 34 TFB: 34 1–5 57/11 Type 1 0.4 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.25% TFB: 0.4 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.25% Open surgical repair of unilateral inguinal hernia
Aksu et al. [19] 2019 Prospective/RCT Turkey/single-center 57 29 ESPB: 28 1–7 44/13 Type 3 0.5 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.25% ESPB: 0.5 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.25% Lower abdominal surgery (inguinal hernia repair, orchiopexy and hydrocelectomy)
Alansary et al. [13] 2023 Prospective/RCT Egypt/single-center 40 20 CB: 20 2–11 35/5 Type 3 0.5 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.20% CB: 1.25 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.20% Open renal surgery (pyeloplasty, nephrectomy, nephrolithotomy)
Ashoor et al. [21] 2023 Prospective/RCT Egypt/single-center 71 32 CB: 39 1–5 58/13 Type 2 1.0 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.25% CB: 2 µg/kg neostigmine + 1.0 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.25% Inguinal hernia repair or orchiopexy
Genç Moralar et al. [20] 2020 Prospective/RCT Turkey/single-center 40 20 IO: 20 3–16 34/6 Type 1 0.5 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.20% IO: 1.0 mg/kg tramadol HCl Lower abdominal surgery (inguinal hernia repair, orchiopexy and hydrocelectomy)
Huang et al. [11] 2021 Prospective/RCT China/multi-center 90 30

TFB: 30

NNB: 30

2–10 25/65 Type 3 0.8 mL/kg ropivacaine 0.3% TFB: 0.8 mL/kg ropivacaine 0.3% Salter acetabular osteotomy, proximal femoral rotation osteotomy, ASIS osteotomy
İpek et al. [22] 2019 Prospective/RCT Turkey/single-center 94 35

TAP: 29

CB: 30

0.5–14 74/20 Type 1 0.5 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.25% TAP, CB: 0.5 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.25% Lower abdominal surgery (inguinal hernia repair, orchiopexy and hydrocelectomy)
Öksüz et al. [24] 2017 Prospective/RCT Turkey/single-center 50 25 TAP: 25 1–7 42/8 Type 1 0.5 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.20% TAP: 0.5 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.20% Inguinal hernia repair or orchiopexy
Öksüz et al. [23]a 2020 Prospective/RCT Turkey/single-center 52 27 CB: 25 1–9 41/11 Type 1 0.7 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.25% CB: 0.7 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.25% Inguinal hernia repair or orchiopexy
Oral Ahiskalioglu et al. [12] 2021 Prospective/RCT Turkey/single-center 40 20 II: 20 1–5 4/36 Type 3 0.5 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.25% II: 0.2 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.25% Unilateral hip dislocation surgery
Priyadarshini et al. [25] 2022 Prospective/RCT India/single-center 60 20

II/IH: 20

TAP: 20

2–12 56/4 Type 1 0.4 mL/kg ropivacaine 0.25%

II/IH: 0.2 mL/kg ropivacaine 0.25%

TAP: 0.4 mL/kg ropivacaine 0.25%

Inguinal hernia repair
Ragab et al. [26] 2022 Prospective/RCT Egypt/single-center 52 26 CB: 26 1–7 37/15 Type 2 0.5 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.25% CB: 1.0 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.25% Lower abdominal surgery (inguinal hernia repair, orchiopexy and hydrocelectomy)
Samerchua et al. [27] 2020 Prospective/RCT Thailand/single-center 38 19 II/IH: 19 1–7 32/6 Type 2 0.5 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.25% II/IH: 0.2 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.25% Inguinal hernia repair
Sato [30] 2019 Prospective/RCT Japan/single-center 44 22 CB: 22 1–17 24/20 Type 1 1.0 mL/kg ropivacaine 0.20% CB: 1.0 mL/kg ropivacaine 0.20% + 0.03 mg/kg morphine Bilateral ureteral reimplantation
Taman et al. [28] 2022 Prospective/RCT Egypt/single-center 85 42 ESPB: 43 2–7 38/47 Type 1 0.5 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.25% ESPB: 0.5 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.25% Laparoscopic abdominal surgery
Zhang et al. [29] 2022 Prospective/RCT China/single-center 180 60

TAP: 60

CB: 60

1–12 132/48 Type 1 1.0 mL/kg ropivacaine 0.20% TAP, CB: 1.0 mL/kg ropivacaine 0.20% Laparoscopic abdominal surgery

QLB: quadratus lumborum block, TFB: transversalis fascia block, ESPB: erector spinae plane block, CB: caudal block, IO: intravenous opioid, NNB: no nerve block, TAP: transversus abdominis plane block, II: incision line injection, II/IH: ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block, ASIS: anterior superior iliac spine, NA: not available.

aDifferent study by the same author published at a different year (patient enrollment periods do not overlap).

Korean J Pain 2024;37:59~72 https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.23268
© Korean J Pain