The Korean Journal of Pain 2019; 32(4): 313-314
Published online October 1, 2019 https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2019.32.4.313
Copyright © The Korean Pain Society.
Pain Center, Pohang Wooridul Hospital, Pohang, Korea
Correspondence to:Daehyun Jo
Pain Center, Pohang Wooridul Hospital, 256 Poseuko-daero, Buk-gu, Pohang 37755, Korea
Tel: +82-54-240-6000, Fax: +82-54-240-6195, E-mail: email@example.com
Received: May 8, 2019; Revised: May 20, 2019; Accepted: May 21, 2019
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
I read the article titled ‘Efficacy of transforaminal laser annuloplasty
When the authors did transforaminal epiduroscopic laser annuloplasty (TELA), they removed the disc material using forceps, which means it was a percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD). Does that mean that they did a PELD with a TELA? We need some endoscopic pictures from the TELA, which would help the readers to understand their procedures. The authors described the intradiscal radiofrequency annuloplasty (IDRA) procedure in Materials and Methods, which said that ‘After placement of the cannula, granulation tissue could often be visualized, with spinal scope (LASE, Minneapolis, MN). However, in the discussion on page 118 in the left column, they described their IDRA as being under C arm fluoroscopy, rather than being performed endoscopically’.
It looks like they used transforaminal laser annuloplasty (TFLA) and TELA for the same procedure. If not, we need to establish their definitions for TFLA and TELA, and correct the overuse of abbreviations, which obstruct and interrupt scientific communication.